Law Offices of Stephen Simonian
The Law Offices of Stephen Simonian of Waukegan, IL provides the best legal defense for clients in Waukegan, IL and surrounding communities. Attorney Steve Simonian, a former assistant state attorney
, Steve fights hard to win the best resolution for his clients
. Whether you are charged with a serious felony or DUI, the Law Offices of Stephen Simonian will use their expertise in the courtroom to fight for your rights.
Learn More About Law Offices of Stephen Simonian:
Criminal Defense – Felonies, misdemeanors, DUI, drug offenses,
weapon charges, assault, sex crimes, traffic violations
DUI Reinstatement - If you need help getting your License
Reinstated - Call Steve
We have offices in Waukegan, IL and Libertyville, IL for your
convenience.
Contact Law Offices of Stephen Simonian today at 847-249-8220
Ways to Beat DUI Cases
- ILLEGAL STOP OF PERSON OR VEHICLE – a
driver cannot be stopped unless the officer has a reasonable
and articulate basis to believe that a traffic law or other
law has been violated. Similarly, a person cannot be seized
unless a violation has occurred.
- WEAVING INSIDE THE LANES IS NOT ILLEGAL
– weaving without crossing any lines is not a violation of
the law, and a vehicle cannot be stopped for that reason.
- ANONYMOUS REPORT OF DRUNK DRIVING -- a
car cannot be stopped simply because an anonymous citizen
reported that the driver was drunk.
- STANDARD FIELD SOBRIETY TESTING IS INACCURATE –
in healthy individuals, the one-leg stand test is only 65%
accurate, and the walk-and-turn test is only 68% accurate in
determining if a person is under the influence. Those
persons with injuries, medical conditions, 50 pounds or
greater overweight, and 65 years or older cannot be validly
judged by these tests.
- NON-STANDARDIZED FIELD TESTS ARE INVALID –
neither the Federal Government (NHTSA) nor medical science
considers touching your finger to your nose, or saying the
alphabet, or counting backwards, as valid sobriety tests.
- BREATH TESTING IS INACCURATE –
virtually all experts concede that one breath test alone is
unreliable. The Illinois Supreme Court has remarked that
breathalyzers are not foolproof. Finally, breath testing in
Illinois is subject to various inaccuracies, including a +/-
12.5% variance, non-specificity for ethanol, etc.
- BOOKING ROOM VIDEOS – Many police
stations videotape suspects at the police station, where
their speech is clear and their balance is perfect, in spite
of police testimony to the contrary.
- IN-SQUAD VIDEOS – more and more often,
the suspect’s driving and performance on field tests is
being recorded; often contradicting police testimony.
- FAILURE TO PROVIDE SPEEDY TRIAL – If a
client is not provided with a trial within 120 to 160 days
of demand, through delays of the court or prosecutor, the
charges must be dismissed.
- POLICE BLOOD TEST INACCURATE – Many
times, police blood testing fails to follow prescribed rules
of testing, analysis, or preservation recommendations.
- HOSPITAL BLOOD TEST INACCURATE –
Hospital blood tests overestimate a person’s true level by
as much as 25% in healthy, uninjured individuals, and are
not statistically reliable in severely injured persons.
- BREATH TEST OPERATOR UNLICENSED – An
Illinois Breath Test Operator must possess a valid,
unexpired operator’s license, or the breath test result is
inadmissible.
- BREATHALYZER MACHINE MALFUNCTIONS – if
there is a malfunction or repair of the breath test
instrument within 62 days before or after a suspect’s breath
test, the results of the suspect’s test are presumed
invalid.
- BREATH TEST OPERATOR LICENSE EXPIRED --
An Illinois Breath Test Operator must possess an unexpired
operator’s license, or the breath test result is
inadmissible. Licenses expire automatically every 3 years.
- BREATH TEST DEVICE NOT APPROVED – A
breath testing instrument must be listed on the Federal List
of Approved Breath Evidential Instruments and the ISP
approved list of Devices, or the results are inadmissible.
- FAILURE TO PROVE DRIVING – a
defendant’s admission to driving, without more, does not
prove a charge of driving under the influence.
- INDEPENDENT WITNESSES – often times,
independent witnesses to accidents, bartenders, hospital
personnel and others can provide crucial evidence of the
defendant’s sobriety.
- FAILURE TO MIRANDIZE – prosecutors may
not use as evidence the statements of a defendant in custody
for a DUI when the police have failed to properly issue
Miranda Warnings.
- FIELD SOBRIETY TEST IMPROPERLY ADMINISTERED –
according to the National Highway and Traffic Safety
Administration, improperly administered field tests are not
valid evidence of intoxication.
- OFFICER’S PRIOR DISCIPLINARY RECORD – a
police officer’s previous disciplinary record can be used to
attack the officer’s credibility.
- PORTABLE BREATH TEST INADMISSIBLE –
Illinois law prohibits the use of portable breath testing
results as evidence at trial in a DUI case.
- PORTABLE BREATH TEST IMPROPERLY ADMINISTERED –
The manufacturers of portable breath testing devices require
a minimum of two tests to consider the results evidential in
nature.
- FAILURE TO CONDUCT OBSERVATION PERIOD –
Illinois requires that a driver be observed continuously for
a minimum twenty minutes prior to a breath test in order for
the results to be considered admissible and valid.
- EXPERT WITNESSES – Expert witnesses are
available to review the validity of breath tests, blood
tests and field sobriety tests.
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH PROBLEMS -- Medical
problems with legs, arms, neck, back and eyes can affect the
results of field sobriety tests. Further, other medical
conditions can also affect the validity of breath test
results.
- BAD WEATHER – Weather reports
establishing high winds, low visibility, and other
conditions are available to explain poor driving or poor
balance.
- LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE TO ARREST -- A
police officer must have specific and articulable facts to
support any arrest for DUI, or the suspension will be
reversed and the evidence suppressed at trial.
- ILLEGAL SEARCH – the police are
prohibited from searching a person or the automobile for a
minor traffic offense, and may not search a car without a
driver’s consent or probable cause. Any evidence illegally
obtained is not admissible in court.
- PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS BY POLICE OFFICERS
– any statement made by a police officer, verbally,
in police reports, or at previous court proceedings may be
used to attack that officer’s credibility.
- POST-DRIVING ABSORPTION OF ALCOHOL –
the prosecutor must prove the blood or breath alcohol at
the time of driving. Recent consumption of alcohol just
prior to driving will cause the test results to be
higher than what the true level was when the person
was operating the automobile.
- INTERFERING SUBSTANCES – many items
contain forms of alcohol which may cause false results, such
as asthma spray, cough drops, paints, fingernail polish.
These items can cause the breath results to be invalid.
- BREATH MACHINE NOT PROPERLY OPERATED –
the manufacturers of breath testing devices have specified
protocols which must be followed for a breath result to be
valid. Failure to follow these requirements will result in
improper readings.
- FAILURES TO PRODUCE DISPATCH TAPES –
most stops of vehicles are recorded on dispatch tapes, as
well as recording police communications regarding an arrest
of an individual. Failure to preserve such tapes upon
request can cause all evidence which could have been
recorded to be suppressed.
- MISLEADING STATEMENTS BY POLICE OFFICERS –
Any misleading statement by the police regarding the
consequences of taking (or refusing) a blood, breath, or
urine test will cause the suspension to be reversed and
removed from the driver’s record.
- STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS – A misdemeanor
charge of DUI must be filed within 18 months of the date of
offense, or the charges will be dismissed outright.
- PRIVATE PROPERTY – a person who has not
driven the car on a public highway cannot be suspended for
drunk driving.
- FAILURE TO DISCLOSE EXPERTS – the
failure of the prosecutor to disclose the state’s expert(s)
will cause those witnesses to be barred from testifying
against the defendant.
- LACTATE RINGERS – when hospital staff
use lactate ringers during the treatment of a patient, the
hospital blood serum results will report falsely elevated,
and therefore invalid, readings.
- FAILURE TO RECORD CERTIFICATION TESTS –
the failure to include the value of the simulator solution
used to test breath machines will cause the breath test
results to be inadmissible in court against the driver.
- BOOKING ROOM VIDEOS - Many police
stations videotape the testing process. These tapes may
establish that the testing procedure resulted in inaccurate
or inadmissible tests due to burping, radio transmitters,
and other improprieties.
.